Suck me shakespeer 2 sub titles movie#

Suck me shakespeer 2 sub titles movie#

I am 17, and I do hope I am not the only person who doesn't think this movie is overrated- I thought it was a brilliant film, that wholly deserved the accolades it received. Her end monologue was beautifully written and Dench's interpretation was flawless. Simon Callow, Martin Clunes and Ben Affleck are solid in their roles, not to mention the wonderful performance of Judi Dench as Queen Elizabeth I. Geoffrey Rush, who actually looks like the Barbossa character he created in the Pirates of the Caribbean films, was hilarious, and Colin Firth makes Lord Wessex intentionally insufferable. And what a talented cast, with Joseph Fiennes utterly charming and handsome as William Shakespeare, and Gwyneth Paltrow in possibly her best performance was by every means captivating as Lady Viola. The direction from John Madden was spot on, and I believe it is the same John Madden who directed some of the greatest Inspector Morse episodes, and Inspector Morse in my opinion is the best British detective drama out there. The screenplay was superlative, very witty and moving, and one of the few screenplays out there that completely blew me away. You cannot go wrong with the splendid locations and the wondrous costumes. The direction from John Madden Shakespeare in Love was a fantastic film in all departments.

Lazy moviemaking.Shakespeare in Love was a fantastic film in all departments. Just 2000's lame teen music playing over many scenes which again shows how cheap and predictable the movie is. You could take the idea and make it work, but it just doesn't here. Maybe if you are a teen and see these scenes and plot points for the first time you won't feel it's as predictable and lame. So you can take the 10 funny scenes and laugh at them while the movie overall is a miss and not worth watching unless you have a huge cringe tolerance. And you know EXACTLY how this stuff goes as 90% of the plot is just stolen directly from those old B-tier Hollywood movies. Instead we focus on the 'influence rebel kids' scenes. Just like we never see much tricking in relation to getting to the buried heist. The tunnel stuff is actually a super cool idea. It's all played up for gags as we see scene after scene with loose plot connections and these characters acting over the top stupid. The lead is trying to get a job at the school to dig up a heist buried under a school building, as we see in the very start, yet he is never clever or secretive about anything. And many other characters act the same way. We see him piss, puke, eat like a pig, constant nose-picking, belching, weird nasty gags. The other main issue, besides it being overly cringe, is that the lead is a disgusting gangster. The movie itself is a cheap movie with flat camera work. So the romance is extremely cringe, just unwatchable. We just see characters act silly and never change unless they have to according to the plot. There is no charm or slow development of anything. When someone falls in love for example we see them overact extreme interest in every single scene. Maybe one every 15 scenes is good the rest fall completely flat with bad acting, terrible cringe comedy and cheap cinematography.

Yeah, some of these gag scenes are funny in the first 30 minutes of the movie before it drops off a cliff and becomes terrible.

It's the kind of flat characters you'd recognize from over the top 80's and 90's teen comedies so unless you think those 'nerd teens go to cool party' movies were amazing comedies this may not be for you. So the handsome disgusting gangster, the cute kind teacher, the rebel kids, the sex fixated female roommate/teacher, the gullible principal. It's basically a collection of ridiculous scenes with flat characters. Pretty bad B movie overall, but did have some funny scenes. Reviewed by JurijFedorov 4 / 10 Overly cringe with a few laughs